SENIOR CITIZENS BEWARE!
It appears some of us have lived to long for Obama and the “Demoncrats” (not misspelled). For anyone over 70 life will be limited, like it or not. I received this from another old friend Allan Moore and just want to share it with as many as possible. Even though you may be younger, growing older may be government limited. Thank your Congressman that gave us the medical finger wave the doctor used to perform. My local hospital administrator commented on this and said it appeared that he should have been to the ER. She also told me there were some circumstances where medical observations could have been covered by Medicare. Regardless life for us old people will never be the same until Congress straightens out this can of worms no one seems to understand. Seniors it looks like it’s time to get your funeral arrangements completed. C Brewer
Letter from a senior gentleman in Mesa, Arizona:
Dear Family, Friends, Neighbors, and former Classmates, I just found myself in the middle of a medical situation that made it very clear that “the Affordable Care Act” is neither affordable, nor do they care.
I’ll go back about seven years ago to a fairly radical prostate surgery that I underwent. The Urologist (a personal Friend) who performed the surgery was very concerned that it was cancer, though I wasn’t told this until the lab report revealed it was benign.
Since that procedure, I have experienced numerous urinary tract infections, UTI’s. Since I had never had a “UTI” prior to the prostate surgery, I assumed that it is one of the side effects from surgery, an assumption since confirmed by my Family Doctor.
The weekend of March 8-9, I was experiencing all the symptoms of another bout of UTI. By Monday afternoon the infection had hit with full force. Knowing that all I needed was an antibiotic, I went to an Urgent Care Center in Mesa, AZ, to provide a specimen a requirement for getting the prescription.
After waiting 45 minutes to see the Doctor, I started getting very nauseous and light headed.
I went to the Receptionist to ask where the bathroom was, as I felt that I was going to throw up. I was told that I would have to wait for the Doctor because I would have to leave a specimen and they didn’t want me in the bathroom without first seeing him.
That was when the lights went out. My next awareness was that of finding myself on the floor (in the waiting room) having violent dry heaves, and very confused. At this point, I tried to stand up but couldn’t make it, and they made it very clear they weren’t going to let me get up until the ambulance got there. By the way, when you’re waiting to see the Doctor and you pass out, you get very prompt attention.
Now, “the rest of the story”, and the reason for sending this to so many of you.
I was taken to the nearest hospital, to emergency. Once there, I was transported to an emergency examination room. Once I had removed my clothes and donned one of those lovely hospital gowns, I finally got to see a Doctor. I asked “what is going on? I’m just having a UTI. Just get me the proper medication and let me go home.” He told me that my symptoms presented the possibility of sepsis, a potentially deadly migration of Toxins, and that they needed to run several tests to determine how far the infection had migrated.
For the next 3 hours I was subjected to several tests, blood draws, EKG’s, and demands for specimens. At about 7:30 the nurse came back to my room to inform me that one of the tests takes 1- 2 days to complete. I asked if they (the results) could be emailed, at which point she informed me that I wouldn’t need them emailed because I wasn’t going anywhere. I started arguing with her, but was told, “If you don’t start behaving, I’ll start taking your temperature rectally,” at which point I became a perfect gentleman. I did tell her I wanted to see the doctor because I had no intention of staying overnight.
Now, this is what I want each of you to understand. Please read these next sentences carefully. The doctor finally came in to inform me that he was going to admit me. I said, “Are you admitting me for treatment or for observation?” He told me that I would be admitted for observation. I said, “Doctor, correct me if I’m wrong, but if you admit me for observation, my Medicare will not pay anything. This due to the Affordable Care Act.” He said,”That’s right, it won’t.”
I then grabbed for my bag of clothing and said, “Then I’m going home.” He said you’re really too sick to be going home, but I understand your position. This health program is going to hit seniors especially hard.
The doctor then left the room and I started getting dressed. I was just getting ready to put my shoes on when another doctor (the closer) came into the room. He saw me dressed and said, “Where do you think you are going?” I simply said “I’m going home.” To which he replied, quite vociferously, “No you aren’t. I said, “Doc, you and I both know that under the “Affordable Care Act” anyone on Medicare who is admitted to a hospital for observation will be responsible for the bill. Medicare won’t pay a cent.”
At which point he nodded in affirmation. I said, “You will either admit me for a specific treatment or you won’t admit me.” Realizing he wasn’t going to win this one, he said he would prepare my release papers. A few minutes later, the discharge nurse came to my room to have me sign the necessary papers, relieving them from any responsibility. I told her I wasn’t trying to be obstinate, but I wasn’t going to be burdened with the full (financial) responsibility for my hospital stay.
After making sure the door was closed, she said, “I don’t blame you at all, I would do the same thing.” She went on to say, “You wouldn’t believe the people who elect to leave for the same reasons, people who are deathly sick, people who have to be wheeled out on a gurney.” She further said, “The ‘Affordable Care Act’ is going to be a disaster for seniors. Yet, if you are in this country illegally, and have no coverage, you will be covered in full.”
This is not internet hype folks, this is real. I just experienced it personally.
Moving right along, this gets worse.
Today I went to a (required) follow up appointment with my Arizona Family Practitioner. Since my white count was pretty high, the follow up was important. During the visit, I shared the experience at emergency, and that I had refused to be admitted. His response was, “I don’t blame you at all, I would have done the same thing.” He went on to say that the colonoscopy and other procedures are probably going to be dropped from coverage for those over 70.”
I told him that I had heard that the “Affordable Care Act” would no longer pay for cancer treatment for those 76 and older, is that true? His understanding is that it is true. The more I hear, and experience the Affordable Care Act, the more I’m beginning to see that we seniors are nothing more than an inconvenience, and the sooner they can get rid of us the better off they’ll be.
We can have an impact on this debacle by letting everyone in Congress know that their responsibility is to the constituents, not the president and not the lobbyists. We need to let them ALL know that they are in office to serve and to look after the BEST INTERESTS of “we the people,” their employers, and not to become self-serving Bureaucrats who serve only out of greed. And if they don’t seem to understand this simple logic, we should fire them. However, our vote is becoming useless!
REMEMBER: Demand your hospital admission is for TREATMENT and NOT for OBSERVATION!
SEND THIS TO EVERY SENIOR AND ALL MILITARY (ACTIVE OR VET) AND LET THEM KNOW THIS IS HOW OUR REPRESENTATIVES ON CAPITOL HILL TREAT THOSE WHO RISK IT ALL SO THEY CAN SIT UP THERE AND ENJOY ALL THE BENEFITS THEY EXEMPT FROM THE REST OF US.
This is sad. C Brewer
Sad but true
Unbelievable Clyde. What in hell are they thinking. One could expect the occasional slip up but not something as serious as this. Did the insurance companies have control over the regulations regarding who and what would be included?
Sorry Clyde but I am told that the letter you quote was a chain letter that has been reported many times as such and has no truth in fact. My young friend up north asks you to check the information below. The letter has been around since before the ACA even while Dubya was president.
I repeat his comments! “Do people really think that the first time they would hear about this would be through a chain letter and not from one of the hundreds of Republican congressmen that are fighting to repeal the ACA? This would be a pretty good argument for them…..if I were true…..but of course it is NOT true. Again, I will ask: if the ACA is soooo bad, why do they have to come up with lies to turn people against it? Shouldn’t there be enough real information for them to pass along about how bad it is?
The truth is that there are some situations that “observation status” changes how patients are billed, but those changes went into effect under GW Bush (and they mostly include nursing home coverage) and have nothing to do with the ACA. Nothing has changed under the ACA to do with the observation rules and this has been an ongoing conversation since long before the ACA
“Andrea Callow, a policy attorney for the nonpartisan Center for Medicare Advocacy, told us in an email that the long-standing concern about how Medicare bills patients receiving observation care, which her organization has been tracking since at least 2000, has “absolutely nothing to do with the Affordable Care Act.”
He also asks you to check
As for the “obamacare will not give cancer treatment to seniors over 76” claim. Well, politifact gave that gem the all covered “pants on fire” status as an absolute bullshit and blatant lie.
Whoever sent you the letter did not do you any favours by not checking before he sent it.
Mr. Brewer, As an avid supporter and reader of your posts, I must take issue with you on this one! While it is extremely important for one to be acutely aware of his/her obligations under Medicare with regard to hospital/ER/Physician care, this post appears to be almost completely inaccurate or just outright false, depending on how one views the opinion(s) of the various pundits that either support or debunk stories like this one. In this particular case, I choose to side with “fact check” who debunks it as a false claim.