A Conservative View

Praying that Donald Trump can save Americas freedoms!

Archive for the tag “Socialist”

VOTING –WILL WE LOSE THIS NEXT?

It took American women nearly 150 years to be able to vote in any election. It took them less than 90 years supported by 18-21 year old idiots to elect a President that will make your vote mean nothing if he is re-elected.

President Obama has divided this great country into a class warfare society in three years. Anyone who denies this is just plain ignorant. If his accomplishments over the last three years were condensed into an unbiased historical video, every seventh grader in America would agree. Unfortunately they don’t vote and most 18-21 year olds have been brainwashed to accept Socialism or God forbid, a Marxist monarchy.

My first time to be eligible to vote for a President was in 1952. I was 22 years old, had served over 4 years in the Navy and married with two children. My concerns, along with my peers who were raised in the depression, were to vote to make sure we had employment. Americans at that time were proud of our country and fortunate that we had endured WW II and were happy to be free. We were raised to be responsible and that work was not a choice but was the American way.

What prompted me to write this article was an event this past Sunday at the local grocery store. Living in a rural area of mostly retired people like myself, local issues dominate conversations. Having served my community in a fight to save the local hospital about five years ago, some new individuals had stirred up a new controversy. Not unlike our current situation in America, people were divided on the issue.

Recently voting was concluded on electing two members of the hospital board and the battle had been unusual. Our hospital Board consists of five members who are elected for two year terms on a staggered basis. These are non paid positions expected to be filled with individuals who have business experience and provide their time as a public service. What was unusual this year was two individuals flooded the county with political signs and repeated paid political ads in our local weekly newspaper. Spending money to run for a non-paid position raised the eyebrows of many, including myself.

My visit to the grocery store involved my asking a lady clerk, whom I have know over 20 years, who won the election for the hospital Board yesterday? She had been intently interested in the previous hospital upheaval in 2007 and had discussed the issues with me at that time. I had written several article and bought ads in both hospital battles.

Her response was one that disturbs me deeply. “I do not vote anymore and really do not care who won.” I politely asked her if that included our upcoming state and national elections this year. Her response was, “yes”. Further discussion revealed that she had lost faith in voting for anyone as no one was qualified to serve anymore. I got specific and asked her opinion of Obama and Romney and she said she “could” not support Romney and “would” not vote for Obama.

This was a sad day for me personally. I was confronted with a middle aged lady who has given up on America. This is not necessarily a total shock but it opened my eyes to wonder how many other pre-65 people share her feelings? Working as a checkout clerk in a small town is not what most would consider a career and it likely pays near minimum wages. The positive aspect of this event was she is still working, instead of asking for food stamps and welfare support.

America is nearing some statistics that I never dreamed could happen. We have already reached the plateau that 49% of our citizens pay no income taxes. We have over 40% of our population drawing some form of government welfare. The percentage of the total workforce in some form of government employment has risen to historical levels and is out of control. Politicians at every level no longer serve as public servants and politics is now a career. Their objective is re-election, not protecting our freedoms from the thieves they have become. They get elected because they are black, white, Hispanic and sell their souls to the power brokers like George Soros, who fund their plunder.

If the current progressive democrats maintain control of government spending and regulatory madness for four more years, elections will be unnecessary forever. When they can assure over 50% of the voting population they will provide for them to live without having to work, who would be stupid enough to vote against them?

I suppose someone can find a silver lining under every cloud if you expand your thought process. I tried real hard and did come up with one positive thing that will happen if we make Obama and future American progressives “Kings” for life. We would not have perpetual elections on TV, radio or the newspapers.

We would have only one government controlled newspaper, propaganda on the radio and only C-Span on TV like other communists nations.

C Brewer   

EVERYONE NEEDS TO WAKE UP!

This video is the most dramatic presentation I have ever seen trying to stop the destruction of America. I hope every American, not just Catholic’s, will pass this on to every freedom loving American alive. Someone has to stop this race to destroy freedom for our children and grand children.       C Brewer 

(http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=D9vQt6IXXaM&)

DEMOCRACY or a REPUBLIC, WHAT’S YOU’RE CHOICE?

I had intended to write three different articles on this subject but it became so intertwined I feel this may be long but it should be educational. It certainly was to me.

Every American who reads this article should be familiar with a “Republic” and its differences with a Democracy. Unfortunately the welfare society is growing to the proportions that they will control the destiny of the ones who actually work for a living and soon. These people probably understand the differences but with the everything free, soak it to the rich and the racially charged atmosphere created by our own President, they don’t really care. I will assure you the current President and his lackeys in Congress, the Supreme Court, main stream media, Progressives and union leaders don’t want them to understand. 

Democracy

Rule by Omnipotent Majority. In a Democracy, the Individual, and any group of Individuals composing any Minority, has no protection against the unlimited power of The Majority.

You can have a Direct Democracy, or a Representative Democracy. In the direct type, applicable only to a small number of people as in small American town-meeting, all of the electorate assemble to debate and decide all government questions and all decisions are reached by a majority vote (of at least half-plus-one). Decisions in these town meetings are, of course, subject to the Constitutions of the State and of the United States. The Majority described is not omnipotent and the example is therefore, this is not an example of a true Direct Democracy.

Representative Democracy is where they have a true parliamentary form of government. The people elect representatives to the national legislature and like in England the elective body is the House of Commons–and it functions by a similar vote of at least half-plus-one in making all legislative decisions.

In both examples of a Democracy, The Majority’s power is absolute and unlimited; its decisions are not subject to be over ruled under the legal system established for this form of government. This allows unlimited Tyranny-by-Majority. 

Why did America become a republic?

The Framers of the United States Constitution condemned the “excesses of democracy” and abuses under any Democracy of the unalienable rights of The Individual by The Majority. The reasons were based on the royal tyranny which had been exercised through oppressions by royal governors and judges of the new State governments. The legislatures acted as if they were virtually omnipotent. There were no effective State Constitutions to limit the legislatures because most State governments were operating under mere Acts of their respective legislatures which labeled as State “Constitutions.” States operated under old Charters.

It was not until 1780 that the first genuine Republic through constitutionally limited government was adopted by Massachusetts–next New Hampshire in 1784, other States later.

Thomas Jefferson stated, “An elective despotism was not the government we fought for.” He also denounced the despotic concentration of power in the Virginia Legislature under the so-called “Constitution”–in reality a mere Act of that body. Having all the powers of government, legislative, executive, judiciary, controlled by one legislative body is not freedom. Concentrating these in the same hands is precisely the definition of despotic government.

Our forefathers by their protests against the “excesses of democracy” were merely making clear their sound reasons for preferring a Republic as the proper form of government. They well knew, in light of history, that nothing but a Republic can provide the best safeguards–in truth in the long run the only effective form of government to protect the people’s civil liberties which are historically victimized by Democracy’s form and system of unlimited Government-over-Man featuring The Majority Omnipotent.

They also knew that the American people would not consent to any form of government but that of a Republic. Jefferson, who was in Paris as the American Minister for several years, wrote Madison in March 1789 the following: “The tyranny of the legislatures is the most formidable dread at present and will be for long years. That of the executive will come its turn, but it will be at a remote period.”

Earlier, Madison had written Jefferson about violation of the Bill of Rights by State legislatures, stating: “Repeated violations of those parchment barriers have been committed by overbearing majorities in every State. In Virginia I have seen the bill of rights violated in every instance where it has been opposed to a popular current.”

In any Democracy–either a Direct or a Representative type–as a form of government, there can be no legal system which protects The Individual or The Minority against tyranny by The Majority. The undependable sense of self-restraint of the persons making up The Majority at any particular time offers, of course, no protection whatever. Such a form of government is characterized by The Majority Omnipotent and Unlimited.

Democracy, as a form of government, was and still is, utterly unacceptable to that of a Republic. The underlying philosophy, expressed in the Declaration of Independence has the people forming their government so as to permit them to possess only “just powers”. This allows us to keep secure, the God-given, unalienable rights of each and every Individual and therefore of all groups of Individuals.

Unfortunately America has been on a path to change our system of government back to its original Democracy that our ancestors fought and died to make a Republic. I only wish more Americans would open their eyes to what the loss of individual freedom means for their ancestors. The Progressive movement to make this change has been gaining strength for over 112 years. Unfortunately Obama and the democrats in leadership today are pressing for a Socialist Democracy, an Empire, a Monarchy or a combination of all, who really knows? I hope you read my recent article on Denmark that describes a combination of a Monarchy and Socialist Democracy combined. I am happy with our “Republic” form of government, are you?  If you desire any other form of government, please move to your country of choice and leave freedom loving Americans alone.

C Brewer

SOCIALISM IN AMERICA

For the past several months I have written that the objective of President Obama and the current National Democratic Party is to take away our freedoms and states’ rights. We heard enough from candidate Obama that he promised to change over and over and over for several months. Well now anyone, who does not share his socialist dreams, can plainly see that he is driven to destroy our Republic form of government. The Pied Piper is leading the blind as history repeats itself again.

He has openly pushed for a European form of a Socialist Democracy. Bush, also a Progressive took us to war to mold Iraq into a Democratic form of government; I never heard him or read that his objective was the “Republic of Iraq”. Progressives always use the term Democracy to portray America. We are not a Democracy and never were intended to be one and with God’s help we will never be one.

First they have all but removed the word “God” from our vocabulary piece by piece. Most Progressives in our history knew that if radical change was imposed that the American people would wake up. They knew that it had to be a well designed plan to be slowly made over a long period of time. As you will see, Obama has no patience.

I have studied history of the modern Progressive and let me just hit on some of the highlights in their dream to destroy the Republic. Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican, started the path we are on over 100 years ago when he began the creation of federal lands. Look at Nevada where 90% of the land is federally owned today as an example. Follow how different Progressives, using wars usually, to increase the amount of federally owned property. You will discover during this series of articles that eventually, the Progressive Socialist objective is to own all of the property.

Next it was Woodrow Wilson a Democrat’s turn to finalize the takeover of the monetary system and install the Federal Reserve as the country was in shock with the World War I, during that era.

Herbert Hoover, a Republican, opened the door for the next phase with inept leadership and we were blessed with Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, and father of the beginning of the creation of our near welfare controlled government of today. It was a struggle but World War II happened and it provided a shield to hide the conversion to Socialism from public view. 

Unfortunately the war provided enough prosperity to slow down the transformation. Next Lyndon Johnson had the opportunity to create another phase by dividing the people along racial disadvantages and increasing FDR’s dream of a Socialist Democracy for America. LBJ perfected the use of racial hatred and voter fraud to win the Texas Senate seat. Lee Harvey Oswald helped become President.

The first real road block for the Progressives was Ronald Reagan a Republican; he was the most freedom loving President in my lifetime. He woke up America and forced the Socialist to have to wait a little longer to achieve their dreams. Bill Clinton, a Democrat, was not a Progressive but he was so deeply enamored with his power he did not even know what a Progressive was. Unfortunately he slept with a devout believer in Socialism; I refer to the one he married and was obviously pressured to try to sell what is today, Obamacare.

George W. Bush, a republican, was not necessarily a true Progressive but was sucked into their cause when he was faced with terrorist killings of Americans. He was lured into starting the unfortunate war in Afghanistan by lousy advisors. Anyone who has ever witnessed life in a Muslim country ruled by religious leaders, as I have, knows that we will never change these people to any other belief until the leaders are eliminated. Look at Iraq and the Medicare drug benefits, where GWB was suckered into again. Part “D” is a disaster. The minute we leave that region it will be taken back by the religious leaders and we will have wasted thousands of American lives for nothing.

As usual Americans were so sick of Bush they would have elected a Communist Muslim and by golly they did. Obama’s beliefs would make all other Progressive Presidents blush with envy. But he is different than the others. He was not satisfied with the pace of the socialistic transformation and kicked the movement into overdrive and added some afterburner power. He masterfully completed the long loved dream of socializing medicine at warp speed. He did not hide his dream of a Socialist Democracy.

Obama mesmerized our young people, brainwashed by our academic professors for the last 60 years, into believing he was the Messiah and would lead them to the Promised Land. Most of the young and the women were fed up with wars and believed his promises to leave the middle east, free the terrorist in our possession and promise everyone anything they wanted and free. He has proved that you can’t buy prosperity buy you can buy votes.

Now Obama understands that enough people he hypnotized have awakened to his scheme and he has to try something else. His mission this year is to generate enough hatred between races and incite the unfortunate of the welfare generation into hating the people who have been successful. He has done more to divide America than the slavery issue that resulted in the Civil War. His only hope for re-election is to incite civil strife. Why else would he support the misguided idiots that are camping out, looting, destroying property and disrupting normal life in our cities?

Next we will look at Denmark, a European Socialist democracy.   

C Brewer

MARXISM

 

I read an interesting article on Townhall.com yesterday that had a topic I felt needed to be included in my series on Socialism.

Remember I wrote about Karl Marx’s contribution to Socialism and included how he was largely responsible for Russia ending up as a Communist nation. The article was written by Mike Adams and I will credit him with direct quotes and repeat some of his facts.

This will hopefully influence your perception of what Obama and the Progressive’s of both major political parties have been preparing for over 100 years. Progressives are usually non-violent, domestically, as you will see later. They want power and your money.

Mike stated, “There are more Marxists teaching in Sociology Departments in America than living in the former Soviet Union. These sociologists hold themselves out as scientists despite the fact that they fail consistently in their efforts to predict the future. In fact, most of them lack the competence to accurately predict the past.” He identifies that among the least competent and most intellectually dishonest is Gary L. Faulkner, Professor Emeritus from the University of North Carolina.

Faulkner recently claimed that Marx predicted the events we are seeing in the Occupy Wall Street movement. He also claimed that events from the 20th Century bolster the credibility of Marx as both an economist and political prophet. He further castigates Republicans for their refusal to embrace Marxism. Faulkner states, “There is something really ironic about Republican’s hatred of Marxism. Years ago Marx predicted capitalism would collapse. The reason – workers would rebel.”

That prediction came true when we watched rebellions in China, Russia, North Korea, Cambodia, Afghanistan, and Vietnam. These resulted in Marxist governments that killed nearly 100 million citizens. “Marx was a violent man who unleashed racist and anti-Semitic assaults on anyone who dared to oppose the use of violence as a means of creating change.”

“Marx would have carried out violence on a larger scale. But his poor physical condition prevented him from doing so. That left the work to followers such as Lenin, Stalin, and Mao. His heavy smoking and drinking zapped his energy. His refusal to bathe – a trait also shared by Mao – resulted in boils all over his body. They brought on nervous collapse and fits of rage – both of which would have prevented him from working and earning his own living had he decided to do so.”

Marx had a passionate hatred of capitalism because he was simply unable to handle money and to organize his own financial affairs. His inability to stay out of debt explains why his theory of capital is so deeply rooted in anti-Semitism. It also explains why he stole many of his most deeply anti-Semitic passages from Martin Luther.

“Although he wrote about the need for revolution, Marx had a strange hatred for those who came from the revolutionary class. His son-in-law Paul Lafargue was from Cuba and had some black blood. He tried to keep his daughter from marrying him and later resented him for refusing to honor his wishes.” Consequently, Marx referred to him as “Negrillo” and “the Gorilla.” Would he have loved Obama?

Marx considered both work and the worker to be beneath him. He lived nearly his entire adult life off of handouts from Engels, the co-author of The Communist Manifesto.

“Marx understood that there would always be men incapable of taking care of themselves. He understood that they would resort to violence whenever they did not get what they wanted. He also understood that there would always be academics who admired gross incompetence and the propensity towards violence.”

I can quickly identify American leaders who share Marx’s beliefs and our current Attorney General is a prime one. How many of our current leaders can you identify as Marxist? Send me your list to compare with mine.

C Brewer

SOCIALISM

I am writing a series on Socialism to either prepare Americans for their destiny or help wake them up before we destroy ourselves. I have used material written by Robert Heilbroner that was provided by my fellow writer Ron to explain the subject

Socialism is a centrally planned economy in which the government controls all means of production. This was the tragic failure of the twentieth century. Born of a commitment to remedy the economic and moral defects of capitalism, it has far surpassed capitalism in both economic malfunction and moral cruelty. Yet the idea and the ideal of Socialism linger on. Socialism in some form is alive and in place in Europe today. Socialism in America will be the subject of my next article.

The Birth of Socialist Planning

Most scholars’ have given credit to Karl Marx as the creator of Socialism. In fact, Marx wrote only a few pages about Socialism, as either a moral or a practical blueprint for society. The true architect of a socialist order was Lenin, who first faced the practical difficulties of organizing an economic system without the driving incentives of profit seeking or the self-generating constraints of competition. Lenin began from the long-standing delusion that economic organization would become less complex once the profit drive and the market mechanism had been dispensed with—“as self-evident,” he wrote, as “the extraordinarily simple operations of watching, recording, and issuing receipts, within the reach of anybody who can read and write and knows the first four rules of arithmetic.”

In fact, economic life pursued under these first four rules rapidly became so disorganized that within four years of the 1917 revolution, Soviet production had fallen to 14 percent of its pre revolutionary level. By 1921 Lenin was forced to institute the New Economic Policy (NEP), a partial return to the market incentives of capitalism. This brief mixture of Socialism and capitalism came to an end in 1927 after Stalin instituted the process of forced collectivization that was to mobilize Russian resources for its leap into industrial power.

The system that evolved under Stalin and his successors took the form of a pyramid of command. At its apex was Gosplan, the highest state planning agency, which established such general directives for the economy as the target rate of growth and the allocation of effort between military and civilian outputs, between heavy and light industry, and among various regions. Gosplan transmitted the general directives to successive ministries of industrial and regional planning, whose technical advisers broke down the overall national plan into directives assigned to particular factories, industrial power centers, collective farms, and so on. These thousands of individual sub plans were finally scrutinized by the factory managers and engineers who would eventually have to implement them. Thereafter, the blueprint for production re ascended the pyramid, together with the suggestions, emendations, and pleas of those who had seen it. Ultimately, a completed plan would be reached by negotiation, voted on by the Supreme Soviet, and passed into law.

Thus, the final plan resembled an immense order book, specifying the nuts and bolts, steel girders, grain outputs, tractors, cotton, cardboard, and coal that, in their entirety, constituted the national output. In theory such an order book should enable planners to reconstitute a working economy each year—provided, of course, that the nuts fitted the bolts; the girders were of the right dimensions; the grain output was properly stored; the tractors were operable; and the cotton, cardboard, and coal were of the kinds needed for their manifold uses. But there was a vast and widening gap between theory and practice.

Russia was the first victim of Socialism.  C Brewer

WAKE UP AMERICA

DOC F……………You may think you don’t have time to watch some messages and many will erase this without even reading my introduction. This video should be shown on C-Span every day until our President and Congress stop this brain washing of our children. If you skip the words, please watch the video that speaks for every American who loves freedom. If you are a socialist, communist, progressive democrat you would just applaud those who refuse to listen to this womans speech. If you do not care at least pass it on.  C Brewer
 
Please take the time to watch this, most accurate description of what is happening to this country and why!!!  Those of you with children (grandchildren) especially need to pay attention to what is being taught in some (many?) of our public schools, universities and colleges.
 
Click on the link below and hear first hand.
 
 

TaboolaArticle 

 

LEADERLESS AMERICA

Leaders are born with a God given ability to guide others to a happy and successful life. Manipulators are educated to use charisma and chicanery to destroy your freedom with false promises and bribery.

Leaders are not an output of any educational system. If the professors in our colleges were leaders they would be successful in business or a philanthropist rather than brainwashing our youth to overthrow our Republic for a Socialist Democracy. They are smart enough to realize they could not gain power as a leader as they are not qualified.

Just observe our current President and most of the Congressional leadership who have been leaderless for far too long. When we elect lawyers to manage our country, we should understand we deserve this leaderless period in American history. Leadership and ethics are not included in the education of lawyers. Our current laws that allow politicians to amass wealth with inside information, is a perfect example that lawyer politicians have no ethics. Some honest members of Congress have tried to change this inequity for several years but the manipulative so called leadership has denied the subject to even be voted on.

We the people are responsible for allowing our Republic to be constantly assaulted as we elected these so called political leaders. In addition we allowed egomaniacs to take over higher education after World War Two.

I never dreamed I would live long enough to see the insurrection we are faced with today in our cities. I served in our military to help protect our rights to be free and it is sad to watch manipulators like Obama, Polisi, Reed and their legions of socialist, actually incite these idiots to take over public domain and businesses in lawless manners.

Our current Attorney General has done more to incite race hatred in America than anyone in the history of the Republic. If Obama was a leader he would have replaced this inept bigot after his first demonstration of failure to prosecute those who violated our voting laws. Sadly Obama has divided this country in an attempt to destroy the Republic by using ethnic and wealth as tools to incite the violence. If FDR had done this when we were attacked in 1941, I would have likely been raised speaking German or Japanese. The difference was FDR was a leader.

Leaders are born to lead and the great ones used our educational system to advance their knowledge. Today we have a socialist President, who was obviously not born to lead, but used the educational system to learn how to divide the people to gain and maintain power. Obama is currently on an ego trip, armed with power far beyond his comprehension or ability to control, slowly destroying our rights to be free of oppression. The really sad part is with incompetents like Reed, Polisi and their army of yes men, they are succeeding in the systematic destruction of America while we watch and do nothing.

Our national media is their biggest source of support. If we stop reading and watching these clowns drivel they will self-destruct. Their objective is to deceive rather than lead.  All they really desire is to kiss Obama’s feet and gain notoriety.

My advice, throw them all out including the media. Replace the politicians with your vote. Eliminate the biased media by not tuning in or reading their trash. All this segment of society has ever wanted was to take your hard earned money and give it to the people who refuse to work for a living.     

C Brewer

“USELESS IDIOTS” PART 2- NEO-COMMUNISTS SYSTEM OF COLLABORATISM!

 

My thirst for knowledge has been enlightened over the past three weeks by watching the spectacle of the “Useless Idiots” in Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan. Until this week it has been hard to locate anyone of stature other than President Obama and Queen Nancy Polosi that have openly praised the damaging results. Now these unwashed hippies have been joined by the professional protesters from the AFL-CIO’s 56 unions and the SEIU. This earth shattering support has now encouraged all Democrats to speed up the process of making America a Socialist Democracy. They have married up with the “Useless” to neutralize the Tea Party movement and play close attention to what they are promoting rather than what they are protesting. There is more relevance to examining not just “what” the protesters are protesting but “what” they are promoting.

What is Collaboratism?

Collaboratism was described by one of the hooded protesters as “the dividing of society into smaller groups and making decisions unanimously.” Equate this with the word collaborate in Webster’s dictionary which is, “to work jointly with others or together in an intellectual endeavor to cooperate with or willingly assist an enemy of one’s country and an occupying force.”

This “Woodstock on the Hudson”, began with protest of capitalism and free-markets against banks and corporations for destroying America’s economic system. Everyone needs to get acquainted with what the end goals will really destroy. This “Useless” group is made up of  a hybrid of hard-core Marxists, from the leftist unions, to socialists and actual Communists. I have read that the real objectives include the seizure of workplaces, businesses, schools and the de-privatization of everything,” The AFL-CIO’s more moderate goal is a worldwide tax on financial transactions. There is also an unofficial  list of demands that will scare the daylights out of any sane American.

A variety of videos on the internet, as well as blog posts,  have included numerous references to “People’s Assemblies” and “General Assemblies”,  in every city, every public square and every township. In reality, this is democratic collectivism taken to its ultimate form of power without authority.

Democrats and unions have wholeheartedly embraced the “Useless Idiots” protests and should wake up: Under the system being exposed there is no place for you. You will join every politician by being out of office and out of power in a leaderless society. This movement you are backing will destroy our capitalist system and freedom for all Americans including you.

Watch for Part 3, “THEY CAN SAVE THE WORLD” on October 12th.

C Brewer

PRENNIAL POLITICS-I’VE HAD ENOUGH!

WAKE UP AMERICA!

The creation of 24/7 television news has provided us with more coverage hourly than we used to see in a week. We are constantly subjected to the egotism of an army of bloviated individuals with their slanted political and social bias. This week alone I feel like I have spent four years and sat on the jury to watch Amanda Knox be exonerated of a crime in Italy. All I really wanted to know was the latest headline news, weather forecast, stock market changes and who won the baseball playoffs.

Obviously I am a conservative and oppose anything that challenges our Republic form of government that made America the success story of all time. I am a freedom loving individual for all who choose to follow our laws. I have no compassion for those who will not abide by our laws or spend their entire lives trying to change our Constitution.

There is no question that innovation has changed in my 81 years and we all have to be flexible to accept changes in anything except our principles. This sets the scene for my message for today, politics.

I guess I should be happy that Amanda Knox did give me a couple of days rest from having to watch Obama seeking his seventy two virgins for destroying our country. She also gave us some respite from watching the army of so called republicans attacking each other for the right to try to replace our self anointed Mohammad as President.

Can you just imagine that if all of the money being spent on seeking their political dream were donated to the treasury we could make a sizeable reduction to our national debt? Our economy is destroyed, unemployment is out of control, and this administration has lied, cheated and stacked the government with a bunch of inept socialist progressives. Some of you voted for change and look what we got.

Now we have states racing to have their primary elections as early as December. It is a shame we did not have them last December so we would only have to listen to two or maybe three tell us how stupid their opponents were. Look at the money that could be saved and the misery of watching that could be reduced. At this point any voter with a exiguous amount of common sense knows who is qualified to serve as our next President and should have chosen his canditate. Everyone else will vote for Obama anyway. He has a cinch on 100% of the dead, 90% of government employees, 100% of the unions, 95% of Africans Americans, 100% of illegal aliens and 90% of all Hispanics and 100% 0f all morons today.

I propose that anytime we have an incumbent President eligible for re-election that the opposition be made to select a candidate to oppose him/her by January 1st of the next year. For the next two years no Presidential political activity will be permitted. This would leave the full election year from January until November as open season to go after each other.

Is anyone else tired of this constant political theater? Obviously I am!   CB

Post Navigation